skip to content »

desd.sytna-hata.ru

Who is steve jobs dating

who is steve jobs dating-13

We're talking top executives at big-name companies like Apple, Altera, Broadcom, Brocade, Cirrus Logic, Comverse, KLA-Tencor, Maxim, Mc Afee, Rambus, Sanmina-SCI, Take Two, Trident, Verisign, and Vitesse. That's serious fallout considering that options backdating is legit as long as the company reports it and accounts for it accurately.

who is steve jobs dating-15who is steve jobs dating-90who is steve jobs dating-27who is steve jobs dating-80

Anderson had already retired in 2004 so, except for giving up some money and his board seat, he got off relatively easy, compared to Heinen.He also exercised and sold 750,000 back-dated shares.In a settlement announced concurrent with the complaint, Anderson - who neither admitted nor denied the allegations - agreed to pay back $3.6 million and never to do bad stuff again.Apple co-founder Steve Jobs' widow Laurene Powell Jobs is dating Adrian Fenty, according to reports.The 49-year-old, who inherited an estate worth nearly £6.5billion, has begun a romance with the former mayor of Washington.has a gossipy piece about two people who don't usually show up in gossipy pieces.

It says Laurene Powell Jobs, the 49-year-old widow of Steve, is in a "budding romance" with former DC Mayor Adrian Fenty, 42. Fenty now works for a venture capital firm co-founded by Marc Andreessen, and Andreessen's wife is friends with Powell Jobs.

As for Jobs, a report from Apple's internal investigation indicated that, while he was indeed aware of the options backdating, "he did not financially benefit from these grants or appreciate the accounting implications." In addition to vindicating Jobs, that same report fingered Heinen and Anderson.

Never mind that Anderson, in a press release, claimed to have informed Jobs of the accounting implications of backdating options in 2001.

The bottom line: Claims that Jobs was unaware of the accounting implications of backdating are hardly believable, but there was no evidence to the contrary.

And, he did not directly benefit from the backdated options because they were canceled and exchanged for restricted shares.

Said another way, do the feds really need to dig that deep to find enough rope to hang executives with?